The year 2020 has wrecked a lot of plans. With only 99 days left in the year, let’s look back at these social club resolutions for 2020 that we made back in December of last year, and see how we managed.
Get Doug to Vegas – Did we ever sneak this under the wire. We left on Sunday, and by the weekend sports were canceled and Nevada Governor Sisolak was preparing to shut down non-essential businesses.
Pay Up on the Game of Thrones Fantasy League – The winner was going to be treated to dinner at Midieval Times. The bill will remain past due, and who knows when we get to pay this off.
Host Another Manbarn Tournament – with the shift to online, we should be able to do this. We tried at one point and drew some casual visitors, but without the appeal of seeing people and sharing the good time, this may be a tougher sell.
Join the Super Contest – we did this while in Vegas. We are off to a rocky start, but as a group we are having a good time and managed to turn this into an internal contest, too.
2021 Calendar Done in 2020 – absolutely no excuses on this one. Nothing but time, and the calendar should be available. Now what we feature in the calendar is another story.
When I was in high school, my friends and I loved to find and rent B movies and watch them for the fun of it. We loved the outlandish premises, gaping plot holes, budget scrimping techniques, use of stock footage, and general silliness of it all. We would relish spotting a particularly poor edit or howler of a line or scene chewing acting. Anyone could request a pause and rewind, and we often did that. It was a sign of our enjoyment.
I recall replaying one particular scene, I believe from “Small Kill (1992)” – starring Gary Burghoff (!), that we watched over and over because a friend spotted the papier mache replacement for a head that you could clearly make out before a gory kill shot.
We had cliches and tropes that we actively looked for in these movies: decapitation, defenestration, gratuitous nudity, death before title sequence.
The worst thing we could say about one of these movies was that they were boring. In particular I remember being just pissed at “The Plumber (1979)”, an Australian made-for-TV movie that failed to entertain on any level. We did not rewind or pause a single time.
So if you want a movie review of “Money Plane”, you are not approaching it the right way. All you need to know is you will want to pause and rewind several times. Have fun with it.
I will make the following positive observations:
Kelsey Grammer (The Rumble) has gas left in the tank. He delivers the movie’s best lines, and not just the ones you have seen in the clip about betting on a dude and an alligator. He has a set piece about creating his own artwork that is also memorable and maybe the most original line in the movie.
A delightful allusion to “The Matrix” delivered by Patrick Lamont Jr. (Trey).
Katrina Norton (Isabella) is highly photogenic and has genuine screen presence. She apparently has gotten a recurring role in Nashville. Here’s wishing her good luck and continued success.
Kudos to the stunt people. Fans of professional wrestling who found this through Adam Copeland (Jack) should enjoy the fight sequences. And there are a couple of amusing, novel kill sequences.
Number of deaths resulting from wagers – over/under 1.5 – This is a good line because you can be assured there will be one. But what are the chances there will be a second?
Will an animal other than a dog appear on screen – yes +200 Everyone has heard the dude and alligator clip. Will we get an alligator? Any animal other than an easily trained dog? Animal handling takes budget, so the chalk is on the no. And as it turns out, one comically acted scene would be the cause of a lot of debate.
Number of clear procedural errors in conducting a casino game – over/under 2.5 – Movie fanatics love to look for errors like continuity and anachronisms and so on. Gambling procedure is pretty well known, strict, and easy to spot on film. This would have made a great bet. As it turns out in one hand of poker there are at least three. I had to re-watch the scene multiple times just to make sure I was not mistaken in what I was seeing. In the age of televised and live streamed poker, how the film makers got this so wrong is really something.
Number of Jack’s crew to die in the heist – o/u 0.5 – real drama means real peril. How many of Jack’s crew will the film makers have the stomach to take out?
Number of scenes with Jake and The Rumble face-to-face – over/under 1.5 – You can see one in the trailer. It is the establishing scene for the heist. So what you are really wagering on is the resolution, the final confrontation. There has to be one, right?
Maybe. Depends on how many B movies you have seen.
Making this an underdog as the movie involves a flying tackle which may be tough in close quarters on the plane. More importantly, WWE almost certainly retains intellectual copyrights on these moves, and I doubt the budget allowed for the producers to license it.
Thomas Jane shares the screen with another speaking cast member, Yes/No
Yes +200 (opening line +250)
While Copeland is the star, Thomas Jane brings more star billing to the movie. He has The Punisher and the HBO Series “Hung” to his credits.
But a review of the trailer does not show him in the planning scene (“this is insane!”) and it does show him operating a drone. A drone? For an actor with solid action movie credits?
This seems to indicate the producers were able to secure Jane for a day and film him, but without anyone else from the billed cast available. So they contrived a way for him to join the action remotely.
This is pure handicapping based on the trailer alone, but could be a fun bet and could stir debate with the grading. Speaking of which…
Number of times someone calls the Thomas Jane character, o/u 5.5
Related to the above bet, but gives that bit of fun every time someone reaches for the telephone.
Death Before Title Credits, Yes/No
Always a reliable trope – will there be an on screen death before the title credit? If this were a horror move, shade it to the yes. But in this case, if they use any action before the title sequence, it is to establish Copeland as a thief in the robin Hood mold, and that does not usually involve killing.
“7 Days to Vegas” (2019) tells the up and down story of Duke (Vincent Van Patten) and how he ends up in an all-or-nothing bet that will grant salvation of finally ruin him.
Or, more accurately, Duke tells the story through narration that persists through the entire movie.
Arguably, this is necessary for a movie that deals with a sub-culture like gambling and whose central dramatic plot is a proposition bet that might seem completely implausible to those not familiar with gamblers and what they are willing to wager. It could also be said that movies like “California Split” and “The Gambler” have done a fine job of establishing their protagonists’ willingness to bet on anything (the seven dwarfs bet in “California Split” comes to mind) without the need to explain everything with voiceover.
This is all just for debate, though, because narrate is what the director Eric Balfour has Vincent Van Patten doing.
Duke goes from actor with some mild success to a has been doing infomercials, to just a has been. But Duke is an affable guy with a knack both for attracting players to his home poker game and enough skill to beat them out of their money.
With the aid of his convivial wife KC (Eileen Davidson, married to Vincent in real life), Duke sees his stable of players increase both in raw number and in the size of their bank rolls. A central part of the attraction of Duke’s growing game are the creative proposition bets that players participate in, both financially and physically.
As the name implies, a prop bet is a wager made on the proposition that event has or has not happened, or a feat can or cannot be done. A hallmark of a group of gamblers is their willingness to bet on a wide array of things. The social club this Web site is built around is no exception. We have bet on weight loss, current events, who will spend the least amount of time in their Las Vegas hotel room over the course of a weekend trip, and how many of our kids someone could successfully name from memory.
Anyone that is part of a gaming group will recognize the dynamics in play with Duke and his friends, enjoy their hijinks, and envy the action. Those that are not can still appreciate the collection of personalities that Duke has assembled, and their willingness to put significant money at risk.
Eventually the game moves out of Duke’s house and into the upper level of a swank Beverly Hills bar. The personalities get bigger, too. Beyond a small time magician (Willie Garson) and his name-dropping publicist brother Carl (James Van Patten, brother to Vincent in real life) new players include colorful names like Angry Jim and Squeeze, and successful figures in the entertainment industry. One in particular, is movie director Sebastian (Ross McCall).
Sebastian is a foil to Duke, not just in terms of his Hollywood success and wealth, but also in how he approaches the game and the gamblers in it. While Duke happy to drink along with his friends and play on the level, Sebastian is more keen to see them get drunk and use that to his advantage. Duke shears sheep, Sebastian wants to slaughter.
At some point this includes stealing the game itself out from under Duke. That strains Duke financially, and coupled with the rivalry between the two, leads to the prop bet that defines the movie and gives it its title. Duke bets Sebastian that he can walk from Los Angeles to Las Vegas in 7 days.
Duke stands to win $5 million if he can complete the walk. The challenge strains his marriage, his friendships, and his endurance. His cohorts use it as a backdrop for more gambling and carousing. There are attempts to influence the bet, changes in stakes, and a surprise appearance or two.
If that sounds like fun to you (and it does to me) you will enjoy the rest of the movie.
I know I did, and no amount of narration can ruin that for me.
As the degens have moved to online poker to keep playing while maintaing social distance, we have gone through a couple of online options before finding a very nice solution in Poker Mavens.
The Poker Mavens software is stable, rich with features, and sophisticated in its ability to run an online card room. I am quite taken with it and have enjoyed deploying it and customizing it. An excellent solution for our group to play together online and I recommend it highly.
The software takes security and privacy into account, but ultimately trusts individual operators to deploy responsibly.
I am sure he is busier now than he has been in a long time, as demand for online solutions for home games surge. But he was plugging away at his work long before now, continuously updating the offering.
Kent Briggs is a textbook engineer. His work is rigorous, documented, tested, and built to standards. It is therefore stable and interoperable.
He is also textbook in the connotative sense, very much a typical engineer I have encountered through my education and career. Driven, independent, conventional, orthodox. Certain.
He prefers simple, accessible design. A lot of beige and brown.
But you can also dive into some specific forum posts and get a feel for his approach to this software and his work in general.
Here are some great examples I managed to piece together.
On putting in a mandatory straddle (or even just calling it a third blind): If you’re looking for home game gimmicks then you’ve picked the wrong software.
On changing the limit for max buy-in: You can’t edit settings on a running table and that’s not how ring games operate anyway. The max buy-in is typically set at 100 BBs. If you want higher stakes, you need a separate table with higher stakes.
On button straddle: Button straddle gives the button player too much of an advantage, IMO.
On practicality of dealer tips in person versus adding them to the software: That’s because those are human beings who have to earn a living. No one tips a computer. When you play slots, you don’t give the machine a little extra on your way out.
On the gender identity required for registration in the UI (so much to unpack here it could make its own post): It’s not required by AccountsAdd in the API. It will default to Male if not specified.
On changing number of hands in mixed games to current number of players on the table: Players come and go so that would make the cycle very inconsistent.
In a discussion about WebSockets, and a question from someone if Kent is using a package like ZeroMQ or Kafka to implement it: I just read the [standards documentation] and manually handled the extra header handshake required in the TCP component I use (Indy Sockets).
I would bet that one of the biggest compliments you could pay Kent was to tell him he made something built-to-last. And I bet he would consider flashy to be an insult.
I feel like I have known Kent my whole life. And he made a really great piece of software.
This social club has been playing poker weekly since 2008, missing only a handful of weeks over that stretch of time.
Our last in-person game was in March, but we have been managing to play together despite social isolation by going online using private tournaments at PokerStars.net.
That has worked out well, but the tournament format means people need to show up at the same time. Stars has the ability to play a ring game, but in particular we like to play pot limit Omaha Hi-Lo (PLO/8) and the options for ring games did not really meet our needs.
So far, the experience has been very good. If you are interested in getting a private group together online to play poker, Faded Spade is a must see.
Ease of Use
There are two entry points for the Faded Spade card club: a public room, called Hearts, where games are open to all; and a private area of reserved game, called Spades. Players register to get a username and password. There is no charge for a player to register and join games.
Reserving a private table is done through the Faded Spade online store.
Options currently include reserving a table, hosting a regularly scheduled multi-table tournament, and co-branded options for commercial entities that want to run marketing events.
We selected two tables of PLO/8 for $20 per month per table. You have to choose ahead of time what game you will be playing at the table (more on that later) but the variety is good, including Hold ‘Em, Omaha, 5 card Omaha, Stud, with lowball and split pot variants available, and various limit structures as well.
You name your table, choose a password for players to access the reserved table, and can even provide a logo to go on to the table surface.
One set up, you are good to go. Players can find the reserved table from the lobby and start playing.
Faded Spade offers a rich set of features and configuration options for players:
A four-color deck is available
Various audio cues (dealing sounds, check and bet sounds, etc) for the game may be turned on or off individually
There is a note feature available to record observations on varioous players
In game chat, with the option to break it out into a larger window
Full hand history with a save feature
In game controls that you expect for options to sit out, check, call, fold, raise in variable amounts or fixed portions of the pot
There is even an option to straddle!
Game play is done through a Web browser. There is no client to install. We had players logging in from various OS and browser combinations, as well as tablet devices.
That is not to say we had no issues. Our first foray saw a lot of our players getting the same error message when trying to sit at a table. We reached out to support and there was a fix within 12 hours, but those were some critical hours over Saturday night where we would like to have been playing.
Moreover, it would be great if, as a subscriber, there were an admin panel available for basic maintenance of table settings that did not require contacting support. In particular it would be nice to switch games to take advantage of the wide variety offered already.
But overall the service has been good and responsive. Which is what makes it worth paying for a subscription when the competition is free. Stars is a good option for home games right now, but it is a marketing tool for the site. I would not expect Stars to respond to any issue, and indeed there were outages of the home tournaments just last week.
The reserved tables at Faded Spade are already a solid offering, and I expect new features to be rolling out to make it an even better place to play (again, game rotation would be a great one, for all those home games that play dealer’s choice and a mix of games, and adding some draw games would be a nice treat).
We will be using it and reporting on updates. Definitely give it a look as an option for your private game.
We maintain a modest online presence as a social club.
Most all communication happens via an email list. This site is mostly for archiving material, and to serve once in a while for posting opinions and reviews, almost all gambling related.
And there is a Twitter account that does much of the same, mostly retweeting items of interest around gambling, drinking, humor, Las Vegas, Baltimore. The common interests for a bunch of middle aged guys who meet weekly for poker.
Not a whole lot original there, not a lot of followers, and so not a lot of amplification.
Today, though, your correspondent tweeted this in response to what is itself the original funny comment on fragile masculinity.
May 26th fell on a Saturday that year. Based on the timing of the auction in the movie (repeated remarks about getting a program ready for Monday after only receiving the gem on a Friday) that does not line up.
Another inaccuracy to note is that Passover was in April of that year, well before the games, whereas Ratner’s family is seen celebrating the Seder in the middle of the series.
Then there is the issue of Garnett making so many visits to New York – including one seemingly on game day. Need a little suspension of disbelief there, for sure.
Ok, that’s it for the trivial stuff. Now let’s look at that big bet.
Howard Ratner does parlay that with two other bets: over on the total of Kevin Garnett total points plus rebounds, and Celtics to win the opening tip.
Individual player prop bets like points and rebounds tend to be even money bets.
Kevin Garnett had a size advantage over Sixers’ starting center Elton Brand, but Brand was quite good at jump balls. For the sake of argument, we can make this a relatively even money bet, too.
Parlaying -350, -110, and -110 does not add up to a million dollar plus win on a $155,000 bet. The payoff would have been more like $577,000. Still a large payday, but not over a million.
That is, if Mohegan Sun had a sports book. Connecticut did not have legal sports betting in 2012, and still do not as of the movie’s debut in 2019.
While the size of the payoff on this bet may not hold up under a bit of scrutiny, the degeneracy of it is clear and believable. Parlaying the opening tip is the play of a true sicko, and the movie makers did really well with this one overall.
There is a phenomenon where your brain can react to someone else’s mistake in the same way as if you yourself made the mistake. It is why you cannot help but comment when you watch someone make a typo.
Gamblers use the term “sweat” to describe the feeling of waiting out a bet or enduring a betting session. And gamblers recognize this second hand phenomenon by using the same term when watching someone else’s bet.
The movie “Uncut Gems” is essentially one long sweat.
Adam Sandler plays Howard Ratner, a middle-aged Jewish jeweler in New York who has taken his degenerate life style past what he can support.
His bookies no longer want his action, his loan sharks are calling in his markers, his wife is through with his fooling around, and his family (to a surprising extent) is done enabling his behavior.
Howard has a scheme to get the money to make things right, and we spend the length of the movie watching him juggle everyone who wants a piece of him – money lenders, business partners, mistress, wife, kids – while trying to pull off this big score.
It is a roller coaster.
There are good movies that portray the obsession of gambling, like “California Split” (1974), “Owning Mahoney” (2003), and most often cited “The Gambler” (1974).
“The Gambler” includes a scene where the protagonist Axel Feed (James Caan) huddles in a bathroom late at night to listen to play-by-play of a basketball game on the other side of the country. It is one of the best depictions of a sweat on film, and certainly for sports gambling.
“Uncut Gems” tops that with a sweat of a different basketball game that lasts easily five times longer on film, and will have the heart of any sports bettor racing furiously.
Directors Benny and Josh Safdie, along with co-writer Ronald Bronstein, orchestrate the climax of Ratner’s scheming to coincide with that game, and the result is a rush.
Adam Sandler turns in a wonderful performance, and we feel the same mix of attraction and frustration that all the people around Ratner feel for him.
Idina Manzel. Judd Hirsch, Eric Bogosian, LaKeith Stanfield, and Julia Fox all deliver that swirl of love, resignation, and co-dependency as the people in Ratner’s immediate circle.
It is Kevin Garnett, though, that grants the perspective to see Sandler not as a movie star, but as a small scale hustler. Not only with his sheer physical size, but also with an on-screen intensity and his own well known celebrity as a professional athlete.
The Safdie brothers do well to talk about Kevin Garnett first, setting the stage for his entrance. It makes Garnett an anticipated center of attention, and allows Sandler to retreat into the role of the failed, broken man.
It is a similar trick to what Al Pacino pulls off in Donnie Brasco. Garnett’s screen presence, like Johnny Depp’s, helps Sandler do that.
Ultimately it is Sandler and the pacing that the Safdie brothers put him through that make the movie work.
By spending so much time with Ratner’s family and business, they also manage to paint a backdrop of Jewish family life, and ruthless New York commerce that add a richness and intimacy to his unfolding plans.
We really do feel Ratner’s mistakes like our own. The tension grows through the entire movie.
Here are some Degenerate Social Club resolutions for 2020:
Get Doug to Vegas – this one is clearly on track with several folks already booked for March. But it has not happened yet, so a formal resolution cannot hurt.
Pay Up on the Game of Thrones Fantasy League – we had a fantasy league for season 7 of Game of Thrones, and the winner was going to be treated to dinner at Midieval Times, (conveniently located next to Maryland Live!). The bill is way past due.
Host Another Manbarn Tournament – we are good at these things and it draws beyond our usual numbers – let’s do it again and spread the degeneracy.
Join the Super Contest – we can pony up, we can get a proxy, let’s join the big NFL betting contest as a group.
2021 Calendar Done in 2020 – the recency of this stings. For two years now the calendar has been late in arriving. Let us resolve to have the 2021 edition done so that it can be up promptly on January 1st.